Skip to main content
Download PDF

Potential roles of vitamin D binding protein in attenuating liver injury in sepsis

Military Medical Research volume 9, Article number: 4 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In sepsis, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) has been shown to be low-expressed. The current study examined the relationship between serum VDBP level and liver injury in sepsis patients, as well as in a mouse model for sepsis and in cultured liver epithelial cell line exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

Methods

The human study included 78 sepsis patients and 50 healthy volunteers. Sepsis patients were categorized into sepsis survivor group (n = 43) and sepsis non-survivor group (n = 35) based on 28-day mortality for data analysis. Adult male C57BL/6 mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Serum samples were collected on day 1, 3, 5 and 7 to determine the levels of VDBP, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D3], 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3], interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Potential protective effects of VDBP overexpression against LPS-induced liver damage were examined in cultured THLE2 cells.

Results

Serum levels of VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 were significantly lower in sepsis patients vs. the healthy control (P < 0.001), as well as in the sepsis non-survivor group vs. the sepsis survivor group (P < 0.001, P = 0.0338, or P = 0.0013, respectively). Lower serum VDBP level was associated with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (r = − 0.2565, P = 0.0234) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (r = − 0.3522, P = 0.0016), but lower serum albumin (ALB, r = 0.4628, P < 0.001) and total protein (TP, r = 0.263, P = 0.02). In CLP mice, there was a 5-day period of serum VDBP reduction, followed by return towards the baseline on day 7. VDBP was also decreased in LPS-treated THLE2 cells (P < 0.001). VDBP overexpression reduced LPS-induced THLE2 damage. Reduced damage was associated with decreased oxidative stress and inactivation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathway.

Conclusion

VDBP may be protective against sepsis-induced liver injury.

Introduction

Sepsis is a major health threat with an incidence of 45 per 10,000 people and approximately 20% mortality [1,2,3]. Sepsis can be caused by a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites, and is characterized by excessive inflammation, immune suppression and systemic activation of coagulation [4,5,6]. Despite significant advances in the management of sepsis in the past decades, there have been no unifying diagnostic criteria and standard treatments [6,7,8].

Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), also known as Gc-globulin, is encoded by the group-specific component (GC) gene [9]. VDBP is essential for the binding, solubilization, and transport of vitamin D and metabolites, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D3] (the major form in circulation) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3] (the active form) [10]. VDBP has been implicated in the regulation of a variety of pathophysiological processes, including chemotaxis, bone metabolism, and inflammatory responses [11, 12]. Previous studies showed lower VDBP plasma levels in sepsis patients than in healthy volunteers [10, 13]. Also, lower level of circulating VDBP in sepsis patients has been associated with more severe disease [14] and increased mortality [15].

Multiple organ failure is a common feature in sepsis patients [6, 16, 17]. VDBP plasma level has been found to be lower in patients who developed multiple organ failure and sepsis after traumatic injury compared with patients who did not [18]. Serum VDBP concentration also has been shown to be increased in most patients undergoing liver transplantation [19], supporting a role of VDBP in liver damage and recovery. In the current study, we first examined the relationship between VDBP level and liver damage in sepsis patients, and then conducted a series of experiments in cultured liver epithelial cells and a mouse model for sepsis to examine the potential mechanisms.

Methods

Clinical investigation

Study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital (S2015-069-01). All subjects provided written informed consents. Adult patients with sepsis (n = 78) were recruited from the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Chinese PLA General Hospital between May 2016 and May 2018. Sepsis was defined using the Sepsis 3.0 Diagnostic Criteria [1]. Patients were categorized into two groups based on 28-day mortality [20]: sepsis survivor group [sepsis (s), n = 43] and sepsis non-survivor group [sepsis (d), n = 35]. Healthy adult volunteers (n = 50) were recruited from the Physical Examination Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital between March 2017 and May 2018. Subjects (either patients or healthy volunteers) with malignancies or human immunodeficiency virus were excluded. Sepsis patients who died within 24 h of diagnosis or received immunosuppressive therapy were also excluded. Serum samples were kept at -80 °C prior to analysis.

Human VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 serum levels were determined using matching enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) commercial kits and manufacturer procedures. Human VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 ELISA detection kits were acquired from Abcam (cat. no. ab223586, Cambridge, UK), Immunodiagnostic Systems (cat. No. AC-57F1, IDS, Boldon, UK), and TSZ Biosciences (Framingham, MA, USA), respectively.

Animal experiments

The study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (2014-X9-16). A total of 40 adult male C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks of age; Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology, Beijing, China) were randomly divided into sham group (n = 20) and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) group (n = 20). Five mice were included at each time point (day 1, 3, 5, 7) after surgery in sham or CLP group. Mice in the CLP group were subjected to CLP treatment as previously described [21, 22]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized intraperitoneally with a combination of Su mianxin injection (Fujian Jitian Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Xiamen, China), ketamine injection (Fujian Jitian Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.) and normal saline (volume ratio = 2:1.5:3.5, 50 μl/mouse). A midline abdominal incision (1.5–2.0 cm) was made. The cecum was ligated with sterile silk sutures from the two-thirds location of the cecum end (2/3 ligation), pierced twice with an 8-gauge needle, and squeezed lightly to force intestinal content into the peritoneal activity before closing the incision. A group of mice undergoing a sham procedure (identical anesthesia and surgical maneuver but no ligation and puncture of the cecum) and identical sampling scheme were included as control. All mice received a subcutaneous injection of pre-warm normal saline (0.05 ml/g body weight) after CLP or sham surgery.

Serum VDBP (cat. no. DY4188-05), interleukin-6 (IL-6, cat. no. M6000B) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α, cat. no. MTA00B) were determined using ELISA kits from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The right liver lobe was fixed in 10% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax, and sliced for hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining using a standard protocol. For immunohistochemistry (IHC), tissue slices were quenched with 3% H2O2, followed by antigen retrieving. Slices were blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h before being incubated with a primary antibody against VDBP (1:200 dilution, cat. no. ab153922, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 2 h at 37 °C. Following incubation with an appropriate secondary antibody, staining was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Images were acquired using an Olympus BH2 microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA), and analyzed using an Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA). The left liver lobe was used for Western blotting and RNA analysis.

Cell culture and reagents

Transformed human liver epithelial cell line (THLE2) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in BEGM basal medium supplemented with 5 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF), 70 ng/ml phosphoethanolamine, and 10% fetal bovine serum (CC3170-BEGM Bullet Kit, Lonza Corporation, Walkersville, MD, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. Recombinant lentiviruses encoding the human VDBP (LV-VDBP) and control (LV-NC) were designed by Hanbio Biotechnology (Shanghai, China).

Caspase-3/9 activity and oxidative stress

Caspase-3 (cat. no. C1116) and caspase-9 (cat. no. C1158) activity was determined using kits from Beyotime Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was measured using a kit (cat. no. ab105136) from Abcam. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was determined using a kit (cat. no. S0131S) from Beyotime Biotechnology. Glutathione (GSH) level was determined using a kit (cat. no. CS0260) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay

Total RNA was isolated from tissue samples or cultured cells using the RNAprep Pure Animal Tissue Total RNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) or the Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. A Fast Quant cDNA first strand synthesis kit (Tiangen Biotech) was used to create the cDNA first strand. RT-PCR experiment was conducted in triplicate using the KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, DE, USA). Primer sequences were: 5′-GCTGACCCTGACTGCTGCTATGAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CATGCAGAGCTTTCGGTTCC-3′ (reverse) for human VDBP; 5′-AGCCTCAAGATCATCAGCAATGCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGTGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCACGAT-3′ (reverse) for human GAPDH.

Western blotting assay

Tissue samples and cells were lysed with pre-cold RIPA lysis solution (Beijing Applygen Technologies) in a glass homogenizer, and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min. Protein concentration was measured using a BCA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins (35 μg/sample) were separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk prior to overnight incubation at 4 °C with a primary antibody against VDBP (1:5000 dilution, cat. no. ab81307, Abcam), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (1:1000 dilution, cat. no. #9252, Cell Signaling Technology), or phosphorylated JNK (p-JNK) (1:2000 dilution, cat. no. #9255, Cell Signaling Technology). The membranes were then incubated with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody (Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology) for 1 h. Protein bands of interest were visualized using an ECL kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cell viability

Cells (104/well) in logarithmic growth phase were plated in 96-well plates. Cells were exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h, and 90 μl of fresh media and 10 μl of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, 5 mg/ml) solution were added to each well. After 4 h, the medium was aspirated and 180 μl dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) was added to each well for 10 min to dissolve the generated formazan complexes. Absorbance was measured at 492 nm.

Apoptosis

Apoptosis was examined using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences) with the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) activity determination

ALT and AST activity was determined using kits (ab105134, ab105135) from Abcam.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to analyze the data. Continuous variables are reported as means ± standard deviation (SD), and analyzed using Student's t-test (for two-group data) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for post hoc pairwise comparison. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Serum VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 were lower in sepsis patients than healthy controls

In comparison to the healthy control group, serum VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 levels were significantly lower in sepsis survivor group [VDBP: (418.06 ± 64.26) μg/ml vs. (295.20 ± 52.90) μg/ml, P < 0.001; 25(OH)D3: (112.30 ± 23.70) nmol/L vs. (26.20 ± 12.70) nmol/L, P < 0.001; 1,25(OH)2D3: (21,706.50 ± 3331.60) fmol/L vs. (8106.00 ± 2952.10) fmol/L, P < 0.001] and sepsis non-survivor group [VDBP: (418.06 ± 64.26) vs. (178.10 ± 30.60) μg/ml, P < 0.001; 25(OH)D3: (112.30 ± 23.70) nmol/L vs. (19.60 ± 12.60) nmol/L, P < 0.001; 1,25(OH)2D3: (21,706.50 ± 3331.60) fmol/L vs. (5852.70 ± 1040.40) fmol/L, P < 0.001] (Fig. 1a–c). Serum VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 levels in the sepsis survivor group were higher than in the sepsis non-survivor group [VDBP: (295.20 ± 52.90) μg/ml vs. (178.10 ± 30.60) μg/ml, P < 0.001; 25(OH)D3: (26.20 ± 12.70) nmol/L vs. (19.60 ± 12.60) nmol/L, P = 0.0338; 1,25(OH)2D3: (8106.00 ± 2952.10) fmol/L vs. (5852.70 ± 1040.40) fmol/L, P = 0.0013] (Fig. 1a–c). A correlation analysis in the sepsis patients showed an association between higher VDBP with higher 25(OH)D3 serum level (r = 0.609, P < 0.001) but not with 1,25(OH)2D3 level (r = 0.1485, P = 0.194) (Fig. 1d, e). Serum 1,25(OH)2D3 did not correlated with 25(OH)D3 in sepsis patients (r = -0.1087, P = 0.344) (Fig. 1f). The demographic and clinical characteristics of sepsis patients in the survivor [sepsis (s), n = 43] vs. non-survivor [sepsis (d), n = 35] group were shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 serum levels were notably downregulated in the sepsis patients. a–c Serum levels of VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 in healthy volunteer group (NC, n = 50), sepsis non-survivor group [sepsis (d), n = 35], and sepsis survivor group [sepsis (s), n = 43] were measured by using the corresponding ELISA kits. Compared with healthy volunteer group, ***P < 0.001; compared with sepsis survivor group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001. d–f Correlation between VDBP and 1,25(OH)2D3 (P > 0.05), VDBP and 25(OH)D3 (P < 0.001), or 1,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D3 (P > 0.05). VDBP vitamin D binding protein

Full size image
Table 1 Clinical information about sepsis patients in the survivor and non-survivor groups
Full size table

Association of low VDBP level with disease severity and liver injury

The severity of sepsis was assessed by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and SOFA scores given their independent correlations with hospital mortality in sepsis patients [20, 23]. In sepsis patients, lower serum VDBP level was associated with more severe disease, as evidenced by higher APACHE II score (r = − 0.2565, P = 0.0234) and SOFA score (r = − 0.3522, P = 0.0016) (Fig. 2a, b). Lower serum VDBP level was associated with lower albumin (ALB; r = 0.4628, P < 0.001, Fig. 2c) and total protein (TP; r = 0.263, P = 0.02, Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association of VDBP level with disease severity and liver injury. a, b Correlation analysis between VDBP serum level and APACHE II (P < 0.05) or SOFA score (P < 0.01) of sepsis patients (n = 78). c, d Bivariate correlation analysis between VDBP serum level and ALB level (P < 0.001) or TP level (P < 0.05) in sepsis patients (n = 78). ALB albumin, APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, TP total protein, VDBP vitamin D binding protein

Full size image

Temporal profile of serum VDBP in CLP mice

Starting from 12 h following surgery, mice in the CLP group displayed signs suggestive of sepsis, including lethargy a fever. Serum VDBP level started to decrease on day 1, reached a nadir on day 5, and returned to baseline level on day 7 (Fig. 3a). Serum levels of IL-6 (Fig. 3b) and TNF-α (Fig. 3c) both peaked on day 1. Only 30% of the mice in the CLP group survived beyond day 5 (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression analysis of VDBP and inflammatory factors in serum samples of sham mice and CLP mice. Mice (n = 40) were randomly divided into sham group (n = 20) and CLP group (n = 20). Five mice were included at each time point (day 1, 3, 5, 7) after surgery in sham or CLP group. a Mouse VDBP level in serum samples was detected in sham and CLP mice at the indicated time points (day 0, 1, 3, 5, 7) after surgery by mouse VDBP ELISA kit. b, c Mouse IL-6 and TNF-α serum levels were detected in sham and CLP mice at the indicated time points (day 0, 1, 3, 5, 7) after surgery by mouse IL-6 or TNF-α ELISA kit, respectively. d Survival rate of sham and CLP mice. Compared with sham group, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. CLP cecal ligation and puncture, IL-6 interleukin 6, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, VDBP vitamin D binding protein

Full size image

Low VDBP expression in the liver of CLP mice

HE staining revealed robust liver damage (e.g. vascular rupture, hemorrhage, hepatocyte edema, abnormalities in hepatocyte distribution and hepatic sinusoid structure) and inflammatory cell infiltration in CLP mice (Fig. 4a). Similar to the temporal pattern of serum VDBP, the extent of liver damage reached a plateau on day 5 (Fig. 4a). IHC test showed lower VDBP levels in the liver tissues of CLP mice vs. sham mice (P < 0.001, Fig. 4b). VDBP level in the liver of CLP mice was the lowest on day 3, and then gradually increased towards the baseline (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Liver pathological analysis and VDBP expression analysis in the liver tissues of CLP mice and sham mice. a HE staining analysis of the liver tissues in sham mice and CLP mice on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after surgery. Black arrow: hemorrhage; Red arrow: edema and hepatic sinusoid structure abnormality; Blue arrow: inflammatory cell infiltration. b VDBP IHC analysis in the liver tissues of sham mice and CLP mice on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after surgery. ***P < 0.001 compared with sham group. CLP cecal ligation and puncture, HE hematoxylin–eosin, IHC immunohistochemistry, VDBP vitamin D binding protein, IOD integrated optical density

Full size image

Experiments in THLE2 cells exposed to LPS

LPS decreased the viability of THLE2 liver cells in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 5a). Effects of LPS were also concentration-dependent at a range between 10 and 10 μg/ml (Fig. 5b). Subsequent experiments using 1 μg/ml LPS for 24 h revealed reduced VDBP mRNA (P < 0.001), protein, as well as secretion into the supernatant (P < 0.001, Fig. 5c). In addition to decreased cell viability (P < 0.001), LPS exposure increased the rate of apoptotic cells, caspase-3 activity (P < 0.001), caspase-9 activity (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5d), as well as the level of ALT (P < 0.001) and AST (P < 0.001) in supernatant (Fig. 5e). These findings showed that the LPS-induced liver cell damage model had been created successfully. Moreover, MPO activity and MDA level were increased (P < 0.001), and GSH level was decreased (P < 0.001) following LPS treatment (Fig. 5f).

Fig. 5
figure 5

VDBP overexpression weakened LPS-induced THLE2 liver cell injury. a THLE2 cells were treated with 1 μg/ml of LPS. At 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after LPS stimulation, the cell viability was estimated by the MTT assay. Compared with 0 h group, ***P < 0.001. b THLE2 cells were stimulated with different concentrations of LPS for 24 h and then the cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. Compared with 0 ng/ml group, *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001. c The THLE2 cells were treated with or without 1 μg/ml of LPS for 24 h. The VDBP mRNA and protein expression levels were measured by RT-qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. The VDBP secretion level was detected by using a commercial kit. Compared with control group, ***P < 0.001. d–f THLE2 cells infected with recombinant lentiviruses encoding the human VDBP (LV-VDBP) and control (LV-NC) were treated with 1 μg/ml of LPS for 24 h, followed by the detection of cell viability, cell apoptotic rate, caspase-3 activity, caspase-9 activity, ALT, AST, MPO activity, MDA level, and GSH level. Compared with control group, ***P < 0.001; compared with LPS + LV-NC group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001. g THLE2 cells infected with LV-NC or LV-VDBP were treated with 1 μg/ml of LPS for 24 h. The protein levels of p-JNK and JNK were determined by Western blotting. ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate transaminase, GSH glutathione, JNK c-Jun N-terminal kinase, LPS lipopolysaccharide, MDA malondialdehyde, MPO myeloperoxidase, p-JNK phosphorylated JNK, VDBP vitamin D binding protein

Full size image

VDBP overexpression using a lentiviral vector attenuated the effects of LPS exposure on cell viability (P = 0.0239), apoptosis, caspase-3 activity (P = 0.0115) and caspase-9 activity (P = 0.0159) (Fig. 5d). VDBP expression also markedly reduced LPS-induced ALT (P = 0.0098) and AST (P = 0.0013) release (Fig. 5e). VDBP overexpression also attenuated the effects of LPS exposure on MPO activity (P = 0.0045), MDA level (P < 0.001) and GSH level (P = 0.0043) (Fig. 5f). LPS exposure resulted in a significant increase in p-JNK protein level in THLE2 cells, and VDBP overexpression inhibited such a response (Fig. 5g).

Discussion

Vitamin D (VitD) participates in a variety of biological processes, including bone metabolism, immunomodulation, inflammatory responses, and cell proliferation [24, 25]. VitD deficiency has been linked to a variety of illnesses, including cardiovascular, autoimmune, and infectious diseases [26, 27]. For instance, the most of burn and critically ill patients were VitD deficient, and low level of VitD was associated with poor clinical outcomes (e.g. sepsis, organ failure, and death) following major burn injury and critical illness [6, 28]. VitD is metabolized in the liver first to 25(OH)D3, and then converted to the active 1,25(OH)2D3 in the kidneys [27, 29, 30]. Previous studies suggested high rate of VitD insufficiency in sepsis patients as well as increased risk of sepsis and poor prognosis in subjects with VitD insufficiency [31, 32]. A recent case report of a patient with severe ankylosing spondylitis who did not react to VitD supplementation [9] showed severe VDBP deficiency, and consequently, in a significant decrease in VitD-responsive CYP24A1 and VitD metabolites such as 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3, due to homozygous deletion of the GC gene.

Similar to previous studies [10, 13], the current study showed lower serum VDBP as well as lower serum levels of 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 in sepsis patients vs. the healthy control. Indeed, low 25(OH)D3 plasma level has been shown to be a risk for sepsis [33]. Also, similar to previous studies [34, 35], we also found lower serum levels of VDBP, 25(OH)D3, and 1,25(OH)2D3 in sepsis patients who did not survive beyond 28 days versus survivors.

Organ failure, particularly the liver failure, is associated with poor prognosis in sepsis patients [16, 17]. VDBP serum level has been found to be significantly lower in patients with acute liver failure or chronic hepatitis B [36, 37]. Several studies have also reported lower serum VDBP levels in patients with hepatic fibrosis and an association of the magnitude of VBP reduction with the degree of fibrosis [38, 39]. A previous study in patients undergoing liver transplantation found biphasic change in serum VDBP: an initial decrease and then return to near-normal levels [19]. Altogether, these findings suggested that a role of VDBP in liver damage and regeneration. In the current study, lower serum level of VDBP was associated with abnormality in liver function indexes (ALB and TP) in sepsis patients, suggesting that the alteration of VDBP level was related to liver dysfunction.

Experiments in CLP mice in our study showed a decrease of serum level of VDBP during the first 5 days after the procedure, followed by return towards a near-normal level on day 7. We also found decreased VDBP expression in the liver of CLP mice. Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α both peaked on day 1. It is well known to us that the inflammatory reactions were rapid in response to injury. Hence, IL-6 and TNF-α levels were immediately increased after injury. Excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines can further aggravate organ injury [40]. Previous studies have also shown that VDBP concentration in the circulatory system is related to organ dysfunction and sepsis after traumatic injury [18, 37]. In our project, some abscesses were observed in the abdominal cavity, enteric canal, and liver on day 5 after surgery, suggesting that organ injury was serious on day 5 after injury. Hence, the time points for significant decrease in VDBP at serum levels were discrepant with those for increase in IL-6 and TNF-α.

The development of organ failure in sepsis is thought to be intimately connected to oxidative stress-mediated damage [41]. Sesamol has been reported to reduce hepatic oxidative stress and alleviate liver damage in the CLP model for sepsis [42]. In cultured THLE2 cells, VDBP expression and secretion levels were significantly decreased upon LPS exposure. Overexpression of VDBP using a lentiviral vector reduced LPS-induced damage and LPS-mediated oxidative stress. The JNK signaling pathway has been implicated in a variety of biological activities, including cell survival, apoptosis, and responses to intracellular and extracellular stressors (e.g. oxidative and inflammatory stress) [43, 44]. The JNK signaling pathway has also been implicated in liver damage caused by intracellular and extracellular stressors [45]. Puerarin, for example, has been shown to reduce LPS-induced liver damage by inactivating the JNK signaling pathway [46]. Inhibiting the JNK pathway with nobiletin protects liver tissues and cultured hepatocytes against inflammatory stimuli-induced acute damage [47]. Reduced oxidative stress and inactivation of the JNK signaling pathway by VDBP overexpression in the current study suggested involvement of the JNK pathway in sepsis-induced liver damage.

Conclusion

In summary, the current study confirmed lower serum VDBP levels in sepsis patients vs. the healthy control. We also found lower serum VDPB levels in sepsis patients who did not survive beyond 28 days versus those who survived. Sepsis patients with lower VDBP serum level had lower ALB and TP, as well as higher APCHE II and SOFA scores, suggesting the negative association of VDBP level and sepsis disease severity. Moreover, VDBP level was reduced in injured livers of sepsis mice and LPS-induced damaged liver cells. Additionally, VDBP overexpression alleviated LPS-induced liver cell injury, which was associated with the reduction of oxidative stress and inactivation of the JNK signaling pathway. However, our experimental methodology was rudimentary, and more research was required to confirm our findings. Animal investigations are needed to examine the impact of VDBP overexpression or knockdown on liver damage and sepsis outcomes, as well as associated molecular processes.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

1,25(OH)2D3 :

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D

25(OH)D3 :

25-Hydroxyvitamin D

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

APACHE:

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

ATCC:

American type culture collection

CLP:

Cecal ligation and puncture

DAB:

3,3′-Diaminobenzidine

DMSO:

Dimethylsulphoxide

ELISA:

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

GC:

Group-specific component

GSH:

Glutathione

HE:

Hematoxylin-eosin

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

JNK:

C-Jun N-terminal kinase

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

MPO:

Myeloperoxidase

p-JNK:

Phosphorylated JNK

PLA:

People’s Liberation Army

RT-qPCR:

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

THLE2:

Transformed human liver epithelial cell line

VitD:

Vitamin D

VDBP:

Vitamin D binding protein

References

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis: current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(3):259–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chousterman BG, Swirski FK, Weber GF. Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39(5):517–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Der Poll T, Van De Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(7):407–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levi M, Van Der Poll T. Coagulation and sepsis. Thromb Res. 2017;149:38–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang P, Zou B, Liou YC, Huang C. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis post burn injury. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkaa047.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rello J, Valenzuela-Sánchez F, Ruiz-Rodriguez M, Moyano S. Sepsis: a review of advances in management. Adv Ther. 2017;34(11):2393–411.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Engelen TSR, Wiersinga WJ, Scicluna BP, Van Der Poll T. Biomarkers in sepsis. Crit Care Clin. 2018;34(1):139–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollis BW. Vitamin D-binding protein deficiency and homozygous deletion of the GC gene. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2583–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong K, Florkowski CM, Doogue MP, Elder PA, Lewis JG. A monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA for vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) is unaffected by Gc-globulin phenotype peptides and actin and demonstrates reduced levels in sepsis and non-sepsis intensive care patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;484:7–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delanghe JR, Speeckaert R, Speeckaert MM. Behind the scenes of vitamin D binding protein: more than vitamin D binding. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;29(5):773–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Pinto R, Ferri C, Cominelli F. Vitamin D axis in inflammatory bowel diseases: role, current uses and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(11):2360.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeng L, Yamshchikov AV, Judd SE, Blumberg HM, Martin GS, Ziegler TR, et al. Alterations in vitamin D status and anti-microbial peptide levels in patients in the intensive care unit with sepsis. J Transl Med. 2009;7:28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Horváth-Szalai Z, Kustán P, Szirmay B, Lakatos Á, Christensen PH, Huber T, et al. Predictive value of serum gelsolin and Gc globulin in sepsis: a pilot study. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(8):1373–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suberviola B, Lavin BA, Jimenez AF, Perez-San Martin S, Garcia-Unzueta M, Santibañez M. Vitamin D binding protein, but not vitamin D or vitamin D-related peptides, is associated with septic shock mortality. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019;37(4):239–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pool R, Gomez H, Kellum JA. Mechanisms of organ dysfunction in sepsis. Crit Care Clin. 2018;34(1):63–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Caraballo C, Jaimes F. Organ dysfunction in sepsis: an ominous trajectory from infection to death. Yale J Biol Med. 2019;92(4):629–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl B, Schiødt FV, Ott P, Wians F, Lee WM, Balko J, et al. Plasma concentration of Gc-globulin is associated with organ dysfunction and sepsis after injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):152–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiodt FV, Bondesen S, Müller K, Rasmussen A, Hjortrup A, Kirkegaard P, et al. Reconstitution of the actin-scavenger system after orthotopic liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease: a prospective and longitudinal study. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5(4):310–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu S, Li Y, She F, Zhao X, Yao Y. Predictive value of immune cell counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis caused by intra-abdominal infection. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkaa040.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gao YL, Chai YF, Dong N, Han S, Zhu XM, Zhang QH, et al. Tuftsin-derived T-peptide prevents cellular immunosuppression and improves survival rate in septic mice. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16725.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel A, Joseph J, Periasamy H, Mokale S. Azithromycin in combination with ceftriaxone reduces systemic inflammation and provides survival benefit in a murine model of polymicrobial sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(9):e00752-e818.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li W, Wang M, Zhu B, Zhu Y, Xi X. Prediction of median survival time in sepsis patients by the SOFA score combined with different predictors. Burns Trauma. 2020;8:tkz006.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Czaja AJ, Montano-Loza AJ. Evolving role of Vitamin D in immune-mediated disease and its implications in autoimmune hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(2):324–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson PH. Vitamin D activity and metabolism in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15(5):443–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor CL, Sempos CT, Davis CD, Brannon PM. Vitamin D: moving forward to address emerging science. Nutrients. 2017;9(12):1308.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Holick MF. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18(2):153–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cho YS, Seo CH, Joo SY, Ohn SH. The association between vitamin D levels and burn factors in different burn types. Burns Trauma. 2020;8:tkaa018.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Muscogiuri G. Vitamin D: past, present and future perspectives in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(9):1221–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Holick MF. Vitamin D and health: evolution, biologic functions, and recommended dietary intakes for vitamin D. Clinic Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2009;7:2–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Upala S, Sanguankeo A, Permpalung N. Significant association between vitamin D deficiency and sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Watkins RR, Yamshchikov AV, Lemonovich TL, Salata RA. The role of vitamin D deficiency in sepsis and potential therapeutic implications. J Infect. 2011;63(5):321–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kempker JA, Panwar B, Judd SE, Jenny NS, Wang HE, Gutiérrez OM. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the longitudinal risk of sepsis in the REGARDS cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(11):1926–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yoo JW, Jung YK, Ju S, Lee SJ, Cho YJ, Jeong YY, et al. Serum vitamin D binding protein level, but not serum total, bioavailable, free vitamin D, is higher in 30-days survivors than in nonsurvivors with sepsis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(25):e20756.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen HB, Eshete B, Lau KH, Sai A, Villarin M, Baylink D. Serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D: an outcome prognosticator in human sepsis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64348.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Antoniades CG, Berry PA, Bruce M, Cross TJ, Portal AJ, Hussain MJ, et al. Actin-free Gc globulin: a rapidly assessed biomarker of organ dysfunction in acute liver failure and cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2007;13(9):1254–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang CZ, Zhang J, Zhang L, Yu CH, Mo Y, Mo LY. Serum vitamin D and vitamin-D-binding protein levels in children with chronic hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(3):255–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ho AS, Cheng CC, Lee SC, Liu ML, Lee JY, Wang WM, et al. Novel biomarkers predict liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients: alpha 2 macroglobulin, vitamin D binding protein and apolipoprotein AI. J Biomed Sci. 2010;17(1):58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Triantos C, Kalafateli M, Aggeletopoulou I, Diamantopoulou G, Spantidea PI, Michalaki M, et al. Vitamin D-related immunomodulation in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32(7):867–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schulte W, Bernhagen J, Bucala R. Cytokines in sepsis: potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets: an updated view. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:165974.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Galley HF. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(1):57–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hsu DZ, Chen KT, Li YH, Chuang YC, Liu MY. Sesamol delays mortality and attenuates hepatic injury after cecal ligation and puncture in rats: role of oxidative stress. Shock. 2006;25(5):528–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hotamisligil GS, Davis RJ. Cell signaling and stress responses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(10):a006072.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim EK, Choi EJ. Compromised MAPK signaling in human diseases: an update. Arch Toxicol. 2015;89(6):867–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakagawa H, Maeda S. Molecular mechanisms of liver injury and hepatocarcinogenesis: focusing on the role of stress-activated MAPK. Patholog Res Int. 2012;2012:172894.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang L, Liang Q, Lin A, Chen X, Wu Y, Zhang B, et al. Puerarin increases survival and protects against organ injury by suppressing NF-κB/JNK signaling in experimental sepsis. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:560.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li M, Zhao H, Wu J, Wang L, Wang J, Lv K, et al. Nobiletin protects against acute liver injury via targeting c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-induced apoptosis of hepatocytes. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(27):7112–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Clinical Research Support Fund of Chinese PLA General Hospital (2018FC-WJFWZX-1-03), Youth Talents Promotion Project of China (17-JCJQ-QT-036), and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (7214254).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kun Xiao and Du-Chao Zhang have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China

    Kun Xiao, Ye Hu, Li-Cheng Song, Jian-Qiao Xu, Pan Pan & Li-Xin Xie

  2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, 100071, China

    Du-Chao Zhang

  3. Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China

    Wan-Xue He

  4. Department of Geriatric Comprehensive Surgery, The Second Medical Center and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China

    Yu-Wei Wang

Authors
  1. Kun Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Du-Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ye Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li-Cheng Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian-Qiao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wan-Xue He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu-Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Li-Xin Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KX and DCZ designed and performed the experiments. KX wrote the manuscript. YH, LCS, and JQX contributed to the experiment. WXH, PP and YWW involved in the data analysis. YWW and LXX designed the experiments and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu-Wei Wang or Li-Xin Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2015-069-01), and in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (2014-X9-16).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, K., Zhang, DC., Hu, Y. et al. Potential roles of vitamin D binding protein in attenuating liver injury in sepsis. Military Med Res 9, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-022-00365-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-022-00365-4

Keywords

Military Medical Research

ISSN: 2054-9369