Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Hypothesis
  • Open Access

A hypothesis study on bionic active noise reduction of auditory organs

Military Medical Research20185:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-018-0155-8

Received: 13 June 2017

Accepted: 8 February 2018

Published: 26 February 2018

Abstract

Background

Noise exposure can lead to hearing loss and multiple system dysfunctions. As various forms of noise exist in our living environments, and our auditory organs are very sensitive to acoustic stimuli, it is a challenge to protect our hearing system in certain noisy environments.

Presentation of the hypothesis

Herein, we propose that our hearing organ could serve as a noise eliminator for high intensity noise and enhance acoustic signal processing abilities by increasing the signal-noise ratio. For suprathreshold signals, the hearing system is capable of regulating the middle ear muscles and other structures to actively suppress the sound level to a safe range.

Testing the hypothesis

To test our hypothesis, both mathematic model analyses and animal model studies are needed. Based on a digital 3D reconstructed model, every structure in the auditory system can be analyzed and tested for its contribution to the process of noise reduction. Products manufactured by this bionic method could be used and verified in animal models and volunteers.

Implications

By mimicking the noise-reduction effect of the sophisticated structures in the hearing system, we may be able to provide a model that establishes a new active-sound-suppression mode. This innovative method may overcome the limited capabilities of current noise protection options and become a promising possibility for noise prevention.

Keywords

ActiveNoise reductionBionicHearing loss

Background

Various types of noise have emerged and increased in our surroundings, e.g., traffic noise, industrial noise, construction noise and loud noise from civilian lives. Noise exposure can lead to not only hearing problem but also multiple system dysfunctions [15]. Protective devices such as earplugs and earmuffs have been developed to alleviate insults to recipients. However, this “passive protection” method has only a limited effect, and the efficacy mainly depends on training and proper use [6, 7].

The traditional method for preventing noise-induced damage is to block noise transmission with walls, sound-absorbent materials or sound-deadening materials. However, the most fundamental method is to decrease the sound energy generated from the sound source. The recent concept of “noise canceling” is based on the generation of a reverse signal by a digital signal processing system [8, 9]. This active method offers a new opportunity for noise prevention, but its restricted effect on high-frequency noise has limited its promotion. So, an efficient system that could actively decrease noise generation is an urgent need for both social development and the military industry.

Herein, we are attempting to propose a brand new hypothesis named “bionic active noise reduction” by presenting the innate structures in the auditory system that may contribute to noise suppression. The novelty of our hypothesis is the use of a bionic method to replicate the relevant hearing structures and their noise-reduction functions to achieve better efficiency in noise protection. The application of such active noise-reduction structures may possibly overcome the current limitations in active noise prevention. Once this hypothesis can be verified, it may have significant implications for noise protection in social medical services and national economies.

Presentation of the hypothesis

  1. i.

    Noise reduction in the auditory system

     

Our acoustic apparatus has evolved into an elaborate organ throughout human history. Within a response range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, it is required to be not only sensitive but also durable to protect itself from injury. Researchers have focused on its precise signal processing ability, but its self-protective noise-reduction mechanism has never been noticed.

In normal physiological conditions, the internal noise of our body, such as the sounds of breathing, blood flow, muscle contractions and joint movements, are suppressed by our internal “sound-reduction system”. This system addresses the internal noise made within oneself and prevents it from influencing external sound processing. Vascular murmurs, created by hemodynamic changes in blood flow, could lead to audible pulses, known as pulsatile tinnitus [1012].

More importantly, for external noise, we think that this innate “sound-reduction system” could actively process external sounds to minimize excessive energy. Sound signals are amplified by the signal amplification system to maintain its sensibility and clarity Furthermore, for suprathreshold signals, the auditory system could actively suppress signals to prevent injury.

For patients with hearing loss, both the ability to sense signals and the ability to reduce noise are decreased. Simply amplifying the signal with a hearing aid cannot mimic the denoising effect of the normal system and makes the amplified sound unbearable. The excessive energy has been dissipated via the middle and inner ear in a functioning auditory system, and if it was not, which indicates a loss of the active noise-reduction function, hearing damage would occur. This process prevents disturbances from our internal physical noise and protects our vulnerable hearing system from being damaged by external intense noise.
  1. ii.

    Features of the active noise-reduction system

     
  1. a)

    Noise-blocking and reducing effect of the Eustachian tube (ET)

     

The ET is a key passage between the nasal cavity and the middle ear. The pharyngeal orifice of the ET works as a valve, which when closed prevents internal noise, for example, self-talking and breathing, from being transmitting to the tympanic cavity. The dysfunction of the ET invariably leads to middle ear problems, such as aural fullness, pain, tinnitus and otitis media [1315]. If the air from breathing flows through the abnormally open ET, the sounds of breathing will be heard and even mask external signal perceptions.

The external 1/3 of the ET, the tympanic section, is an open, funnel-shaped tube covered with mucosal folds [16]. These features are somewhat similar to a muffler. We suppose that these features could help dissipate the vibrational energy of the tympanic membrane and round window. This will also assist in the reduction of acoustic signals in the middle ear and balance the middle ear pressure. For intense sounds, the ET could act as an important mechanism to reduce pressure and energy. This can be proven by the fact that opening the mouth can protect the tympanic membrane from loud noise exposure [17]. In short, the ET plays an important role in the noise-reduction system and functions to both block noise from entering the inner ear and dissipate the energy in the middle ear.
  1. b)

    Function of middle ear skeletal muscles in the protection from noise-induced injury

     

The middle ear muscles, the tensor tympani and stapedius muscles, also have important functions in noise protection. The stapedius reflex is a significant protective reflex when the ear is stimulated by intense sounds. This mechanism reduces the excessive energy that passes into the inner ear. The amplitude of the stapedius reflex is decreased in patients with noise-induced hearing abnormities even when their thresholds are normal at 1000 Hz, which confirms that their noise-reduction system is affected [18]. A researcher showed that the stapedius reflex has an important function in decreasing internal sound in order to perceive external signals better [19]. This has a positive effect on language perception under noisy conditions. The contraction of the tensor tympani could prevent the rupture of the tympanic membrane and damage to the inner ear. It is sensitive to mechanical stimuli and protects the hearing system from loud sounds.

The reflexes of both the stapedius and tensor tympani are important innate mechanisms that prevent noise damage by effectively decreasing the intense noise rushing into the inner ear.
  1. c)

    Function of inner-ear-related structures in noise protection

    The oval window, blocked by the stapes footplate and ligament, transfers sound energy from middle ear to the inner ear. The structure of the footplate and ligament ensures the efficient and precise conductive movement of the oval window. It is notable that the surrounding ligament could limit the vibration of the oval window in response to loud sound stimuli within an appropriate range. This prevents hair cell injury caused by excessive basilar membrane movement.

    The moderate transmission of sound wave energy in the inner ear from liquid (perilymph) to solid (basilar membrane) can largely avoid direct mechanical injury to hair cells. On the other hand, the existence of endolymph and perilymph could facilitate the later attenuation of sound when waves dissipate in the fluid. The vibration of the perilymph causes the round window to vibrate, and energy is buffered and reduced through vibration and deformation.

    The endolymph and perilymph are connected with the endolymphatic sac and the cochlear aqueduct. We presume that these structures also facilitate the energy dissipation. When hydrolabyrinth and aqueduct obstructions emerge, lymphatic discharge abnormities will cause vestibular dysfunction and hearing loss, such as Meniere’s disease. Large vestibular aqueduct dysfunction also leads to severe hearing loss.

    The noise-reduction system we proposed involves the mentioned structures in both the middle ear and the inner ear, and it works as a cooperative system to protect the hearing system from intense noise injury. When the system fails to limit the sound signal within an appropriate range, inner ear damage occurs and may eventually develop into noise-induced hearing loss.

     
  1. iii.

    Progress in research on the pathogenesis and therapy of noise-induced hearing loss

     
  1. a)

    Pathogenesis of noise-induced hearing loss damage

     
Understanding the mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss is still a challenge in otolaryngology. Nordmann proposed the theory of cilium damage in the year 2000 [20]. Our group discovered that hair cells could maintain normal cellular function for 2 weeks after cilium was impaired [21]. The first 2 weeks became the optimal timeframe for hearing recovery. This work first proved the self-healing ability of tip-links after hair cell cilium damage [22]. We also discovered a cascading effect after hearing injury and proposed a four-stage inner ear pathology theory. We further established the basic strategy of hair cell regeneration and gene therapy after hearing loss [23]. The mechanism of neurotrophic factors in the improvement of hearing is the utilization of the self-healing ability of tip-links.
  1. b)

    Progress in the therapy of noise-induced hearing loss

     
  1. 1)

    Surgical therapy of noise-induced hearing loss promoted the development of otology

     
Based on almost 1000 cases of cochlear implants, we performed the first auditory implantation in a noise-induced hearing loss patient, and it restored the patient’s hearing [2426]. In addition, we took part in the research and development of the first cochlear implant made in China, which conforms to the features of Chinese tone and breaks the monopoly of imported products.
  1. 2)

    Breakthrough in gene therapy of noise-induced hearing loss

     
We found that the expression of the Math1 gene increased hair cell numbers in guinea pigs. It could induce the regeneration of hair cells and improve hearing [27, 28]. The combination of DAPT (a γ-secretase inhibitor in the Notch signaling pathway) and Math1 gene expression greatly increased the number of hair cells by affecting hair cell proliferation and cilium growth [28, 29]. We further developed a new nano-gene vector, which expanded the clinical practice of gene therapy in noise-induced hearing loss patients [30].
  1. 3)

    Studies on stem cells make progress

     

Studies on stem cells indicate a promising prospect for the treatment of noise-induced hearing loss [31]. We found a method to induce the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into hair cell-like cells [32]. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) transplanted after drug-induced hearing loss could enter the cochlea through a hole in the scala tympani and migrate to the scala media and vestibular cisterna. They could also differentiate into myosin-VIIa-expressing hair cell-like cells [33].

Testing the hypothesis

Through the understanding and verification of this active system, we are proposing a creative method to mimic the noise-suppression function of our hearing system. To test our hypothesis, model analyses and animal model studies are needed.

Using micro-CT scanning and three-dimensional reconstructions, a digital model of our hearing system (including the external auditory canal, middle ear and inner ear) can be rebuilt and used for acoustic analysis. Through a preliminary mathematic model analysis, we found that the energy passing from the tympanic membrane to the closed tympanic foramen of the ET is less than that to an open ET (data not shown). This suggests that the opened tympanic foramen of the ET receives part of the acoustic energy and plays a specific role in energy dissipation. Every structure in the auditory system can be analyzed and tested for its particular contribution to the process of noise reduction mentioned above.

Then, we could imitate the structure with a bionic method and apply it in the manufacture of protective devices or muffling devices. For example, a bionic ET could be created through 3D printing, and its function could be verified in animal models or volunteers with ET dysfunctions. Once proven, these structures or products could be widely used in both disease treatment and industrial manufacturing. Similar mechanisms to those mentioned above, such as the stapedial reflex, are also candidates. Products designed based on this theory will overcome the limitations of traditional reverse-wave elimination and damping absorbers.

Implications of the hypothesis

The hearing system is a complex neurobiological feedback control system, and researchers have discovered the active cochlear amplifier, which is important in evolution. We think the hearing organ has equipped itself with a self-protection mechanism, which we summarize as a function of active noise reduction. We should realize that under different frequency or intensity conditions, different effects may be present in the same structure.

Bionic structures manufactured based on this theory would have a noise reduction function and could be used in the treatment of patients with noise reduction problems, for which there is no current medical treatment. For example, 3D–printed ETs could be implanted to improve dysfunctions in the original ETs.

On the other hand, it is very important especially for the military industry and military noise prevention. The application of this type of bionic auditory structure in weaponry or military equipment will greatly decrease military noise-induced damages.

These promotions may lead to favorable directions for the prevention and treatment of hearing loss and facilitate the development of the military industry and social health.

Abbreviations

DAPT: 

γ-secretase inhibitor in the Notch signaling pathway

ESC: 

Embryonic stem cell

ET: 

Eustachian tube

MSC: 

Mesenchymal stem cell

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is supported by a major project of Twelfth Five-Year Plan (BWS14J045), a major project of the National Ministry of Science and Technology (2014ZX09J14101-06C), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (81528005, 81470700), the National Key Basic Research Development Program (973 Program) (2012CB967900), the Hundred Leading Talent Project of High-Tech Beijing, and a fostering fund of the Beijing Science and Technology Commission on Frontier Technology in Life Sciences.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

QQJ collected the references and drafted the manuscript, NY participated in the editing and improvement of the manuscript, and SMY developed the noise reduction theory and improved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Science, Ministry of Education; Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Beijing, China

References

  1. Tabraiz S, Ahmad S, Shehzadi I, Asif MB. Study of physio-psychological effects on traffic wardens due to traffic noise pollution; exposure-effect relation. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2015;13:30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Stansfeld S, Clark C. Health effects of noise exposure in children. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2(2):171–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ristovska G, Laszlo HE, Hansell AL. Reproductive outcomes associated with noise exposure - a systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(8):7931–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Munzel T, Gori T, Babisch W, Basner M. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(13):829–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dzhambov AM. Long-term noise exposure and the risk for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2015;17(74):23–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Mischke C. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD006396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Mischke C. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a Cochrane systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(Suppl 2):S84–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin JH, Li PC, Tang ST, Liu PT, Young ST. Industrial wideband noise reduction for hearing aids using a headset with adaptive-feedback active noise cancellation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005;43(6):739–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bromwich MA, Parsa V, Lanthier N, Yoo J, Parnes LS. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(1):104–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassandro E, Cassandro C, Sequino G, Scarpa A, Petrolo C, Chiarella G. Inner ear conductive hearing loss and unilateral pulsatile tinnitus associated with a dural arteriovenous fistula: case based review and analysis of relationship between intracranial vascular abnormalities and inner ear fluids. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2015;2015:817313.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Grewal AK, Kim HY, Comstock RH 3rd, Berkowitz F, Kim HJ, Jay AK. Clinical presentation and imaging findings in patients with pulsatile tinnitus and sigmoid sinus diverticulum/dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(1):16–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pons Y, Verillaud B, Ukkola-Pons E, Sauvaget E, Kania R, Herman P. Pulsatile tinnitus and venous cerebral thrombosis: report of a case and literature review. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2012;133(3):163–4.Google Scholar
  13. Sproat R, Burgess C, Lancaster T, Martinez-Devesa P. Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults. BMJ. 2014;348:g1647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Park JJ, Luedeke I, Luecke K, Emmerling O, Westhofen M. Eustachian tube function in patients with inner ear disorders. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(5):1615–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sim MW, Stewart TA, Snissarenko EP, Xu HX. Congenital cholesteatoma involving the Eustachian tube. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(4):600–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunsolo E, Marchioni D, Leo G, Incorvaia C, Presutti L. Functional anatomy of the Eustachian tube. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010;23(1 Suppl):4–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shen JX. Intraspecific communication of chinese concave-eared torrent frogs by high-frequency sounds. Sci Technol Rev. 2008;26(22):94–8. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  18. Houghton JM, Greville KA, Keith WJ. Acoustic reflex amplitude and noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology. 1988;27(1):42–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aiken SJ, Andrus JN, Bance M, Phillips DP. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited. Ear Hear. 2013;34(4):e38–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordmann AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res. 2000;139(1–2):13–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo WW, Liu HZ, Sun JH, Hu YY, Yang SM. Cochlear hair cell pathologic morphology changes after intense noise explosure. Chin J Otol. 2009;7(4):324–6. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  22. Jia S, Yang S, Guo W, He DZ. Fate of mammalian cochlear hair cells and stereocilia after loss of the stereocilia. J Neurosci. 2009;29(48):15277–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang SM. Strategies of inner ear hair cell regeneration and gene therapy for hearing loss. Chin J Otol. 2009;7(4):271–7. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  24. Han DY, Yu LM, Yu LM, Ji F, Young WY, Yang SM. Acoustic neuroma surgery for preservation of hearing: technique and experience in the Chinese PLA general hospital. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(5):583–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li JN, Han DY, Ji F, Chen AT, Wu N, Xi X, et al. Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with MNGIE syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(9):1012–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang SM, Li JN, Jiao QS. Strategies of inner ear hair cell regeneration and gene therapy for hearing loss. Chin J Otol. 2009;7(4):271–7. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  27. Xu JC, Huang DL, Hou ZH, Guo WW, Sun JH, Zhao LD, et al. Type I hair cell regeneration induced by Math1 gene transfer following neomycin ototoxicity in rat vestibular sensory epithelium. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(8):819–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao LD, Guo WW, Lin C, Li LX, Sun JH, Wu N, et al. Effects of DAPT and Atoh1 overexpression on hair cell production and hair bundle orientation in cultured organ of Corti from neonatal rats. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23729.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Li LX, Sun JH, Guo WW, Lin C, Yang SM. The influnce of DATP on hair cell development of in vitro rat basal membrane. Chin J Otol. 2012;10(30):338–43. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  30. Ren LL, Wu Y, Han D, Zhao LD, Sun QM, Guo WW, et al. Math1 gene transfer based on the delivery system of quaternized chitosan/Na-carboxymethyl-beta-cyclodextrin nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;10(11):7262–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang SM, Zhao LD. Current situation and challenge for the biotherapy on hearing loss. Chin J Otol. 2011;9(3):239–43. (Article in China)Google Scholar
  32. Qin H, Zhao LD, Sun JH, Ren LL, Guo WW, Liu HZ, et al. The differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into inner ear hair cell-like cells in vitro. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131(11):1136–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao LD, Li L, Wu N, Li DK, Ren LL, Guo WW, et al. Migration and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells transplanted into mature cochlea of rats with aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133(2):136–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement