Open Access

Medical rescue of naval combat: challenges and future

Military Medical Research20152:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-015-0048-z

Received: 21 November 2014

Accepted: 3 August 2015

Published: 26 August 2015

Abstract

There has been no large-scale naval combat in the last 30 years. With the rapid development of battleships, weapons manufacturing and electronic technology, naval combat will present some new characteristics. Additionally, naval combat is facing unprecedented challenges. In this paper, we discuss the topic of medical rescue at sea: what challenges we face and what we could do. The contents discussed in this paper contain battlefield self-aid buddy care, clinical skills, organized health services, medical training and future medical research programs. We also discuss the characteristics of modern naval combat, medical rescue challenges, medical treatment highlights and future developments of medical rescue at sea.

Keywords

Naval combat Medical rescue challenges Rescue highlights Future development

Background

There is no doubt that Spratly Islands and Diaoyu Islands belong to China. Some countries have disputed over the territory for centuries, and recent increased tension has made the area a substantial issue in Asia. Based on this issue, the possibility of military conflict or naval combat is a problem for the involved countries. In naval combat history, the latest large-scale naval battle was the 1982 Falklands Battle between UK and Argentina, which caused a total of 907 deaths and 1843 injuries [1]. Based on Chinese records of naval combat in 1974 and 1988 between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea [24], the weapons used in these limited-scale combats included short-range artilleries, guns and grenades. Despite the rapid development of battleships, weapons manufacturing and electronic technology in the last 30 years, naval combat will present many new characteristics.

Established in 1871, U.S. Navy Medicine Health Care now consists of five distinct “Corps”: Medical Service Corps, Nurse Corps, Medical Corps, Dental Corps and Hospital Corps. Each corps consists of personnel specializing in a particular health care field [5]. Additionally, the U.S. has established navy medicine departments around the global to support the Navy and Marine Corps. In Asia, U.S. navy medicine centers exist in Japan, Cambodia, Singapore and Vietnam. These factors indicate the importance of medical rescue at sea [6].

Challenges of medical rescue at sea

Environmental

The battlefield tends to be in the ocean, far from land or shoreline. Casualty rescue would be extremely difficult during the sustained fighting environment in the battlefield. Some characteristics of the seawater include cold temperature, hypertonicity and pathogenic bacteria, which cause additional damage to the casualty [79]. For example, compared with simple firearm wounds, the healing time of firearm wounds after seawater immersion can be delayed [10].

Weapons

Widespread use of high-speed and precision-guided underwater explosive weapons or missiles can cause more complex and multiple forms of injuries [11]. Blast damage is the leading cause of death on the modern battlefield, especially in navy combat [12]. For tactical purposes, non-explosive weapons such as infrasound weapons, laser weapons, electromagnetic weapons and microwave weapons can be used on the battlefield.

Combatant distribution

For the purpose of mobility, concealment and ammunition load, surface ships and marines’ cabins are usually designed to be narrow and small [13]. Because of the densely distributed combatants in the cabins, there could be substantial casualties once attacked. Additionally, the casualties in various cabins would present various types of trauma.

Difficulties of medical rescue at sea

Casualty distribution

Combatants in surface battleships and submarines are concentrated and dense. Once attacked, there would be substantial casualties at the same time, and the doctors would have difficulty evaluating all casualties in a short period of time. In some situations, once combatants are dropped in the seawater, an unpredictable distribution of combatants would occur because of the waves and the battlefield’s blasts. In this type of dispersed distribution, it is very difficult to search or salvage the casualty, thereby delaying treatment. The Health Department of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) invented an electronic casualty location system that can help search for casualties on land, but it has not been well tested in the naval setting [14, 15].

Complex injuries

The blast of explosive weapons can cause injuries to multiple sites of the body at the same time, such as head trauma, extremity fractures, spine injury and chest or abdomen trauma. The initial injury mechanism is acceleration damage from the blast, and the consequent injury mechanism is deceleration damage from hitting the bulkhead or instruments inside the cabins [16]. Some weapons will cause combined injuries such as blast injury, burn injury, seawater immersion injury and decompression injury, etc. [17]. These combined injuries cause extremely complex clinical manifestations and are difficult to treat.

Diagnostic and transport difficulties

Well-equipped hospital ships, such as PLA NO.866 hospital ship and USNS Mercy, usually maintain a particular distance from the battlefield [18]. Sometimes, doctors on the battleships diagnose the casualty at the place where the damage occurred by simple medical equipment or even only by clinical symptoms [19, 20]. Casualty transport from surface battleships to hospital ships mainly depends on suspended transporters on rescue ships or limited helicopters [21]. Submarines rarely use surface transport due to their undercover and combat mission requirements. Therefore, we must recognize that casualty transport from battleships to hospital ships or land-based hospitals are very difficult during war [22].

Medical rescue highlights

Self-Aid Buddy Care (SABC)

SABC encompasses basic life support and limb-saving techniques to help casualty or injured personnel survive in medical emergencies until medical help is available. Generally, SABC requires that injury judgments must be accurate, measures must be quick and everyone must do their best to make the casualty stable [23]. The airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure (ABCDE) approach still plays a classic and practical role in the immediate assessment and treatment of the critical casualty [24].

Damage control

In the pre-hospital treatment of a critical casualty, the best method is damage control surgery to avoid further deterioration [25]. Doctors correct hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy and other fatal failures at the same time of initial resuscitation [26]. In encountering multiple associated injuries, priority attention should be given to high mortality situations such as shock, bleeding and brain trauma [27, 28]. In U.S. military medicine, the Forward Surgical Team (FST) has been tested to be a very efficient group of doctors who can complete damage control surgery independently [2931].

Efficient transport

For those urgent or critical casualties who need further medical treatment, it is important to arrange air transport as soon as possible. Forward doctors report the patient’s information to the higher-level hospital before transportation so doctors can prepare efficiently to ensure the continuous treatment after transportation [32]. Various vehicles (military ships, military planes or civilian ships) should be used to rescue as many lives as possible during war.

Medical rescue: future tasks

SABC training

The training of all combatants is critical for meeting our current requirements and preparing for challenges. The topics of SABC training encompass administrative overview, anatomy and physiology, communicable diseases/universal precautions, airway management, recognition and control of bleeding, shock management, dressings, bandaging, fractures, splinting, heat/cold related injuries, burn injuries, victim assessment and patient transportation/litter movement [33, 34].

Trauma protection and new weapons research

Protection is important for all types of trauma [35, 36]. To relieve blast shock in naval combat, it is necessary to set anti-shock devices such as anti-shock chairs and seat belts in the possible positions in the cabins of battleships. Cabins should have anti-collision materials installed on bulkheads and equipment surfaces to avoid secondary collision injuries. Combatants should be equipped with impact resistance helmets and cushioning shoes. As the mechanism of new weapons injuries remains unclear, it is imperative for military medicine researchers to continue investigating the weapons and their effects [37].

Combination of military and civilian medical forces

It would be efficient to establish a medicine command center that can organize military and civilian medical forces during war. Closer to battle, Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) could play a substantial role [30]. New diagnostic equipment could be invented, such as portable intracranial hematoma diagnostic equipment and portable electronic monitor devices. To be closer to casualties, there should be enough Dock Hospital or Combat Support Hospitals (CSH) on nearby coasts. Additionally, civilian medical forces also undertake important tasks in casualty care, blood supply, drug supply, etc.

Injury mechanism of seawater

Characteristics of seawater injuries include drowning, cold temperature, hypertonicity and pathogenic bacteria. A study found 21 forms of bacteria from 85 strains in the Nansha district [38]. The average bacterial number was 336.60 ± 160.79 cfu/ml. These bacteria were all highly susceptible to 16 antibiotics. Another study found 34 types of bacteria in the Southeast littoral [39]. The susceptibilities of the bacteria to 21 antibiotics were tested. These investigations are important for the prevention and therapy of bacterial infections related to seawater. It is essential to create a practical rewarming plan for hypothermia in casualties salvaged from seawater [40, 41].

Conclusion

Medical rescue is a complicated and challenging topic. The topic involves many indispensable aspects that should be considered during peace times. We must clearly understand the challenges we face and the weaknesses in our current medical system. Future work should include training and research. The future development of trauma prevention and portable equipment used in medical rescue at sea must be powerful enough to save more people.

Abbreviations

SABC: 

Self-aid buddy care

ABCDE: 

Airway, breathing, circulation, disability and exposure

FST: 

Forward surgical team

CSH: 

Combat support hospital

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thank Prof. Zheng-Guo Wang from The Third Military Medical University and Prof. Hui Jin from Navy Weapon Base for their suggestions on underwater explosion injury and new weapon injury mechanisms. Many thanks to Prof. Yong-Hua Tao from the Navy Medicine Institute for his introduction to medical rescue challenges at sea.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Key Laboratory of Wound Repair and Regeneration of PLA, College of Life Sciences, General Hospital of PLA

References

  1. Woodward S. One Hundred Days: The Memoirs of the Falklands Battle Group Commander. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Zhui C. Paracel Islands Naval Combat records of 1974. Arch Space. 2012;11:7–10.Google Scholar
  3. Wang BF, Song XF. Records of paracel islands naval combat. Natl Def Educ. 2012;7:70–1.Google Scholar
  4. Yuan L. The 30th anniversary of paracel islands naval combat. Shipborne Weapons. 2004;4:79–87.Google Scholar
  5. Navy Medicine Almanac 2014. 2014. http://www.med.navy.mil/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
  6. Navy Medicine Almanac 2015. 2015. http://www.med.navy.mil/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  7. Hu XH, Duan YY, Li Y, Xue ZQ. Early responses of VEGF during acute lung injury induced by seawater immersion after open chest trauma. Respiration. 2010;79:490–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ai JG, Zhao F, Gao ZM, Dai W, Zhang L, Chen HB, et al. Treatment of seawater immersion complicated open knee joint fracture. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:5523–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tisherman SA. Hypothermia and injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004;10:512–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ning HY, Meng YH, Liu X, Wang DP, Yu JY. Recording the healing progress changes of the firearm wounds after seawater immersion model in Wistar rats. Chin J Med Guide. 2015;1:86–8.Google Scholar
  11. Gawande A. Casualties of war--military care for the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2471–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Champion HR, Holcomb JB, Young LA. Injuries from explosions: physics, biophysics, pathology, and required research focus. J Trauma. 2009;66:1468–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jurd KM, Seddon FM, Thacker JC, Blogg SL, Stansfield MR, White MG, et al. Submarine ‘safe to escape’ studies in man. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014;41:307–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo JS, Deng QK, Gong J. Development of apparatus for remote personal vital status monitoring and positioning. J First Mil Med Univ. 2002;22:4.Google Scholar
  15. Sha K, Xie T, Hu XY. Casualty location system using Beidou satellites and ZigBee system. Med Equip. 2013;34:41–2.Google Scholar
  16. DePalma RG, Burris DG, Champion HR, Hodgson MJ. Blast injuries. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1335–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ricci G, Pirillo I, Rinuncini C, Amenta F. Medical assistance at the sea: legal and medico-legal problems. Int Marit Health. 2014;65:205–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lagrew J, Lujan E, Nelson SC, Hauff NM, Kaesberg JL, Lambert ME, et al. Pacific partnership 2010: Anesthesia support aboard the USNS Mercy humanitarian civic assistance. Mil Med. 2012;177:939–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Andersson SO, Lundberg L, Jonsson A, Tingström P, Dahlgren MA. Fixing the wounded or keeping lead in the air-tactical officers’ views of emergency care on the battlefield. Mil Med. 2015;180:224–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Beale PJ, Kerwin-Nye A. Battlefield first aid. J R Army Med Corps. 2000;146:53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Enad JG, Headrick JD. Orthopedic injuries in U.S. casualties treated on a hospital ship during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Mil Med. 2008;173:1008–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Andersson SO, Lundberg L, Jonsson A, Tingström P, Dahlgren MA. Interaction, action, and reflection: how medics learn medical care in the Swedish Armed Forces. Mil Med. 2013;178:861–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mangalmurti SS, Murtagh L, Mello MM. Medical malpractice in the military. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:664–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thim T, Krarup NH, Grove EL, Rohde CV, Løfgren B. Initial assessment and treatment with the Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) approach. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:117–21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi B, Sun J, Cao Y, Yang F, Wu Y, Liang X, et al. Application of vacuum sealing drainage to the treatment of seawater-immersed blast-injury wounds. Int Wound J. 2015; doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12444.
  26. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197:532–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Alam HB, Burris D, DaCorta JA, Rhee P. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Mil Med. 2005;170:63–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nyein MK, Jason AM, Yu L, Pita CM, Joannopoulos JD, Moore DF, et al. In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury. PNAS. 2010;107:20703–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Counihan TC, Danielson PD. The 912th forward surgical team in Operation New Dawn: employment of the forward surgical team during troop withdrawal under combat conditions. Mil Med. 2012;177:1267–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Eastridge BJ, Stansbury LG, Stinger H, Blackbourne L, Holcomb JB. Forward Surgical Teams provide comparable outcomes to combat support hospitals during support and stabilization operations on the battlefield. J Trauma. 2009;66:S48–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen GJ, Ellison R, Kuhens C, Roach CJ, Jarrard S. Operation Enduring Freedom: trends in combat casualty care by forward surgical teams deployed to Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2011;176:67–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie T, Liu XR, Chen GL, Qi L, Xu ZY, Liu XD. Development and application of triage and medical evacuation system for casualties at sea. Mil Med Res. 2014;1:12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kam C, Lai C, Lam S, So F, Lau C, Cheung K. What are the ten new commandments in severe polytrauma management? World J Emerg Med. 2010;1:85–92.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Baer DG, Dubick MA, Wenke JC, Brown KV, McGhee LL, Convertino VA, et al. Combat casualty care research at the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155:327–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambert JL, Hartstein G, Ghuysen A, DOrio V. Emergency practice: specifics in the management of complex multiple trauma. Rev Med Liege. 2001;56:149–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Newgard CD, Schmicker RH, Hedges JR, Trickett JP, Davis DP, Bulger EM, et al. Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the “golden hour” in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:235–46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bellamy RF. How shall we train for combat casualty care? Mil Med. 1987;152:617–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang F, Zhou JH, Yang ZH, Wang ZG, Li XY, Ning X, et al. Experimental study on characteristics of underwater blast injuries. J Trauma Surg. 2007;9:540–3.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang ZL, Xie PZ, Wang XB. Investigation of seawater pathogenic bacteria and its antibiotic susceptibility in NanSha district. J Prevent Med PLA. 2013;31:100–2.Google Scholar
  40. Han SQ YUJY, Jiang T, Wang DP, Shao P, Huo Y. Investigation of the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria in brine of the southeast littoral. J Naval Gen Hosp PLA. 2006;19:208–12.Google Scholar
  41. Vaagenes P, Gundersen Y, Opstad PK. Rapid rewarming after mild hypothermia accentuates the inflammatory response after acute volume controlled haemorrhage in spontaneously breathing rats. Resuscitation. 2003;58:103–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jin et al. 2015