Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of main studies included in the review (see Additional file 1: Table S2 for full study summaries)

From: Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care

Authors

Year

Purpose

Methodology

Features

Dataset used

Dataset size

AUROC (or relevant performance metric)

Ahmed et al.[27]

2020

Mortality prediction model

DNN

Age, INR, PT, PTT, haemoglobin, hematocrit, WBC, platelets, creatinine, glucose, lactate

MIMIC III

3041

AUROC: 0.912

Kilic et al. [28]

2010

Determining time period for calculation and evaluation of trauma severity and predicted mortality after a period of resuscitation

Fuzzy-logic inference system

SBP, GCS, changes after 1 h of resuscitation

Data from hospital/ER records

150

AUROC: 0.925

Kuo et al. [29]

2018

Mortality prediction of motorcycle riders suffering traumatic injuries

SVM

Age, SBP, HR, RR, RBC, platelet, haemoglobin, hematocrit, GCS, AIS, ISS

Data from hospital/ER records

946

AUROC: 0.9532

Maurer et al. [30] and El Hechi et al. [31]

2021

Trauma-outcome predictor (TOP) smartphone tool

TOP

Age, SBP, HR, RR, SpO2, Temperature, comorbidities, GCS, injury mechanism, AIS

ACS-TQIP

934,053

AUROC (penetrating trauma: 0.920, blunt trauma: 0.830)

Cardosi et al. [32]

2021

Predicting trauma patient mortality

XGBoost

Age, SpO2, PR, RR, Temperature, GCS, injury type

NTDB

2,007,485

AUROC (children data: 0.910, adult data: 0.890, all aged data: 0.900)

Lee et al. [33]

2021

Prognostic prediction for critical decision-making

XGBoost

Age, HR, RR, MAP, GCS, AIS

Data from hospital/ER records

2232

AUROC: 0.940

Tran et al. [34]

2021

Mortality prediction model

XGBoost

Injury mechanism

NTDB

1,611,063

AUROC: 0.863

Tsiklidis et al. [35]

2020

Outcome predictor for survival

Gradient Boost

Age, SBP, HR, RR, Temperature, SpO2, GCS

NTDB

799,233

AUROC: 0.924

Becalick et al. [36]

2001

Assessing probability of survival after trauma

ANN

Age, RR, SBP, SpO2, HR, Injury type, AIS, ISS, GCS

UKTARN

2042

AUROC: 0.921

Sefrioui et al. [37]

2017

Predicting patient survival using readily available variables

SVM

Age, injury type, BP, GCS, RR,

NTDB

656,092

AUROC: 0.931

Batchinsky et al. [38]

2009

Predicting life-saving intervention based on EKG derived data

ANN

Heart rate complexity

USAISR Trauma

262

AUROC: 0.868

Liu et al. [39]

2017

Predicting life-saving intervention

MLP

HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, RR, SpO2, SI, PR

WVSM trial

79

AUROC: 0.990

Liu et al. [40]

2018

Predicting life-saving intervention

MLP

HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, RR, SpO2, SI, PR

WVSM trial

104

Correlation coefficient: 0.779

Kim et al. [41, 42]

2018, 2021

Decision-making algorithm for remote triaging

DNN

Age, HR, SBP, SI, SCS

NTDB

1,204,290

AUROC: 0.890

Scerbo et al. [43]

2014

ML model for triaging trauma patients

RF

Age, HR, SBP, DBP, SpO2, RR, GCS, injury type

Data from hospital/ER records

1653

Sensitivity: 0.890, Specificity: 0.420

Nederpelt et al. [44]

2021

In-field triage tool for determining shock, MT, need for major surgery

Dirichlet DNN

Age, BMI, HR, SBP, RR, Temperature, GCS, injury location

ACS-TQIP

29,816

AUROC (shock: 0.890, MT: 0.860, need for major surgery: 0.820)

Follin et al. [45]

2016

Predicting need for specialized trauma care

DT

Age, HR, SpO2, SBP, GCS, ISS, injury mechanism

Data from anonymized prospective trauma registry

1160

AUROC: 0.820

Mina et al. [46] and Hodgman et al. [47]

2013, 2018

Smartphone app for predicting Massive Transfusion cases

LASSO regression

Mechanism of injury, HR, SBP, BD, ISS, RBC, resuscitation intensity

Data from hospital/ER records. Validation data from PROMMTT database

10,900/1245

AUROC (training: 0.956, validation: 0.711)

Feng et al. [48]

2021

Demand prediction for traumatic blood transfusion

XGBoost

Trauma location, Age, HR, RR, SI, SBP, DBP, SpO2, Temperature

Data from hospital/ER records

1371

AUROC: 0.940

Lammers et al. [49]

2022

Predicting risk of requiring massive Transfusion

RF

HR, RR, DBP, SBP, SpO2, Temperature, INR, Hematocrit, Platelet, pH, mechanism of injury, GCS, AIS, ISS

DoDTR

22,158

AUROC: 0.984

Chen et al. [50]

2008

Determining hypovolemia in patients

Linear ensemble classifiers

HR, RR, DBP, SBP, SpO2

Data from hospital/ER records

898

Accuracy: 0.760

Convertino et al. [51]

2011

Determining patients at greatest risk of ongoing hemorrhagic shock

undefined ML algorithm

SBP, DBP, RR, blood pH, base deficit

Data from subjects under LBNP

190

Accuracy: 0.965

Rickards et al. [52]

2015

Determining hypovolemia in patients

undefined ML algorithm

HR, stroke volume, ECG, heat flux, skin temperature

Data from subjects through various exercises under LBNP

24

Accuracy: 0.926

Davis et al. [53]

2022

Intracranial hemorrhage detection

NLP tool

CT scan images

Data from hospital/ER records

200 scans (25,658 images)

Precision: 0.730

Ginat et al. [54, 55]

2020, 2021

Intracranial hemorrhage detection

NN software

CT scan images

Data from hospital/ER records

8723 scans

Accuracy: 0.965

Davuluri et al. [56]

2012

Hemorrhage detection and image segmentation model

SVM

CT scan images

Data collected from hospital/ER records

12 scans (515 images)

Accuracy: 0.943

Perkins et al. [57]

2021

Prediction tool for detecting TIC

BN

HR, SBP, temperature, hemothorax, FAST scan, GCS, lactate, pH, mechanism of injury, fracture assessment

Data from hospital/ER records

1091

AUROC: 0.930

Li et al. [58]

2020

Prediction model for acute traumatic coagulopathy

RF

RBC count, SI, base excess, lactate, DBP, pH

Emergency Rescue Database

1014

AUROC: 0.830

  1. AIS abbreviated injury scale, ANN artificial neural network, BMI body mass index, BN bayesian network, DBP diastolic blood pressure, DNN deep neural network, DT decision tree, ECG electrocardiography signal, FAST Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, GCS Glasgow Coma Score, HR heart rate, INR international normalized ratio, ISS injury severity score, LASSO least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, LBNP low body negative pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, MLP multi-layer perceptron, NLP natural language processing, PR pulse rate, PT prothrombin time, PTT partial thromboplastin time, RBC red blood cell, RF random forest, RR respiratory rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, SCS Simplified Consciousness Score, SI shock index, SpO2 oxygen saturation, SVM support vector machine, TOP trauma outcome predictor, WBC white blood cell