Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of typical cell viability studies

From: A review on cell damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting

Method

Bioink

Application

Cell viability

References

Inkjet-based bioprinting

PEGDMA, human chondrocytes

Cartilage-like constructs

89%

[139]

Sodium alginate, 3T3 fibroblasts

Zigzag tubes

82%

[140]

Sodium alginate, 3T3 fibroblasts

Vascular-like constructs

> 90% after 1 d

[141]

PEG/peptide, hMSCs

Cartilage-like constructs

89%

[86]

Extrusion-based bioprinting

Nanofibrillated cellulose, alginate, hNCs

Aricular constructs

70%

[44]

Alginate sulfate, nanocellulose, chondrocytes

Miniature ears

> 85% at day 14

[142]

Polyurethane solutions and NSCs

Nerve-like constructs

> 50% after 1 d

[143]

Alginate, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells

Vascular-like constructs

> 91% after 7 d

[9]

Laser-assisted bioprinting

Alginate, 3T3 fibroblasts

3D constructs

> 90%

[144]

HUVECs, biopaper

Osseous constructs

92.4%

[72]

3T3 fibroblasts

3D constructs

> 93.5%

[145]

Hyaluronic acid, hiPSCs

3D constructs

> 94% with control effect

[146]

Stereolithography-based bioprinting

GelMA, PEGDA, EY, 3T3 fibroblasts

3D structure

85% for at least 5 d

[21]

GelMA, EY, 3T3 fibroblasts

3D structure

91.5%

[124]

GelMA, HUVECs, C3H/10T1/2 cells

Prevascularized tissues

> 85%

[147]

GelMA, LAP, mBMSCs

Native-like tissues

95%

[148]

  1. PEGDMA poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate, PEG polyethylene glycol, hMSCs human mesenchymal stem cells, hNCs human nasal chondrocytes, HUVECs human umbilical vein endothelial cells, hiPSCs human induced pluripotent stem cells, GelMA gelatin methacrylate, PEGDA polyethylene glycol diacrylate, EY eosin Y, LAP lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethyl-benzoyl phosphinate, mBMSCs mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, NSCs neural stem cells, 3D three-dimensional