Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of incidence rate of military parachute injuries

From: Incidence and risk factors associated with injuries during static line parachute training in Royal Thai Army

Investigation

Study design

Injury case definition

Sample

Type of parachuting

Incidence rate (/1000)

Knapik et al. [2], 2011

Prospective study

Physical damage to body reported by medics in the drop zone

The 82nd Airborne Division of the XVIII Airborne Corps; trained paratroopers in training exercises

Static line

10.5

Hughs et al. [4], 2008

Retrospective study

Injuries recorded in unit medical records

4th Battalion Royal Australian Regiment; trained paratroopers in training exercises

Static line

50.5

Farrow [5], 1992

Prospective study

Physical damage to body requiring evacuation from drop zone, withdrawal from exercise, duty restriction, or hospitalization (excluded abrasions and lacerations)

Parachute Battalion Group, Australia; trained paratroopers in training exercises

Static line

7.1

Dhar [6], 2007

Retrospective study

Referred cases for parachute related injuries from local military unit

Not clearly stated

Not clearly stated

Minor injuries = 13.5

Major injuries = 9.0

Deaton and Roby [7], 2010

Prospective study

Any personnel reporting to the military surgeon for care related to airborne operations in the drop zone and placed on limited duty

US Marine Reconnaissance unit in Iraq; trained paratroopers in training exercises

Static line

8.23

Essex-Lopresti [9], 1946

Retrospective study

Any physical damage recorded in drop zone by medical officer

6th Airborne Division, United Kingdom; trained paratroopers in training exercises

Static line

21.0