Combat lifesaver-trained, first-responder application of junctional tourniquets: a prospective, randomized, crossover trial

Table 2 Survey results by subgroups

Questions	All Participants	Combat Medics	Combat Lifesavers	Medics vs CLS P value
Questions	Median [IQR]	Median [IQR]	Median [IQR]	Medics vs CLS P value
I prefer using the JETT because it is easy to adjust compared with the SJT.	2.5 [1.0, 4.0]	3.0 [2.0, 5.0]	2.0 [1.0, 4.0]	0.18
I prefer using the SJT because it is easy to adjust compared with the JETT.	4.0 [2.0, 4.5]	4.0 [2.0, 5.0]	4.0 [3.0, 4.0]	0.23
The application of the SJT can be easily handled by one person.	4.5 [4.0, 5.0]	5.0 [4.0, 5.0]	4.0 [4.0, 5.0]	0.72
The application of the JETT can be easily handled by one person.	4.0 [3.0, 5.0]	4.0 [3.0, 5.0]	3.0 [2.0, 4.0]	0.006^*

IQR Interquartile Range, JETT Junctional Emergency Treatment Tool, SJT SAM Junctional Tourniquet; CLS Combat lifesaver; *P value< 0.05

ISSN: 2054-9369