Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between mode and gradient with their significance, pairwise comparison, P value and F value for the different parameters

From: Effect of heavy load carriage on cardiorespiratory responses with varying gradients and modes of carriage

Dependent variable

Independent variable

F value

P value

Post hoc Bonferroni test (pairwise comparison)

HR (beats/min)

Mode

F(2, 10) = 50.92

0.000*

M1-M2* (0.001)

M2-M3, NS

Gradient

F(4, 20) = 275.55

0.000*

G1- G3*(0.000)

G1- G4*(0.000)

G1- G5*(0.000)

G2- G3*(0.025)

G2- G4*(0.001)

G2- G5*(0.000)

G3- G4*(0.000)

G3- G5*(0.000)

G4- G5*(0.001)

Mode × Gradient

F(8, 40) = 12.015

0.000*

RF (breaths/min)

Mode

F(1.112, 5.560) = 17.104

0.000*

M1-M2*(0.000)

M2-M3, NS

Gradient

F(4, 20) = 19.679

0.001*

G2- G5*(0.022)

G3- G5*(0.027)

G4- G5*(0.004)

Mode × Gradient

F(8, 40) = 5.137

0.000*

VO2 [ml/(min·kg)]

Mode

F(2, 10) = 4.991

0.000*

M1-M2, NS

M2-M3, NS

Gradient

F(4, 20) = 963.97

0.031*

G1- G3*(0.000)

G1- G4*(0.000)

G1- G5*(0.000)

G2- G3*(0.000)

G2- G4*(0.000)

G2- G5*(0.000)

G3- G4*(0.000)

G3- G5*(0.000)

G4- G5*(0.000)

Mode × Gradient

F(8, 40) = 5.663

0.000*

EE (kcal/min)

Mode

F(2, 10) = 4.802

0.000*

M1-M2, NS

M2-M3, NS

Gradient

F(4, 20) = 957.28

0.035*

G1- G3*(0.000)

G1- G4*(0.000)

G1- G5*(0.000)

G2- G3*(0.000)

G2- G4*(0.000)

G2- G5*(0.000)

G3- G4*(0.000)

G3- G5*(0.000)

G4- G5*(0.000)

Mode × Gradient

F(8, 40) = 6.789

0.000*

  1. HR Heart rate, VO2 Oxygen consumption, EE Energy expenditure, RF Respiratory frequency; *P < 0.05; NS Not significant, G1. Grade 1, −10%; G2. Grade 2, −5%; G3. Grade 3, 0%; G4. Grade 4, 5%; G5. Grade 5, 10%; M1. Mode 1, NL; M2. Mode 2, distributed mode; M3. Mode 3, compact mode; “-”. No data