Skip to main content

Table 3 Blood gas analysis comparison between the two groups

From: Effects of internal iliac artery embolization on systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs with simulated-pelvic-fracture combined with massive bleeding

Index Group Pre-modeling Post-modeling
0 h 2 h 4 h 8 h
pH value CG 7.34 ± 0.04 7.29 ± 0.06 7.27 ± 0.03 7.22 ± 0.04 7.16 ± 0.03
EG 7.32 ± 0.03 7.33 ± 0.05 7.27 ± 0.04 7.25 ± 0.04 7.22 ± 0.03
F 1.78 1.44 1.78 1.11 8.58
P 0.25 0.41 0.25 0.79 0.0067
PaO2 CG 120.4 ± 5.7 112.4 ± 6.9 100.5 ± 5.4 108.5 ± 6.1 111.3 ± 7.1
EG 121.6 ± 6.1 114.6 ± 7.2 105.2 ± 7.7 111.5 ± 4.7 109.3 ± 6.4
F 1.15 1.09 2.03 1.68 1.23
P 0.78 0.82 0.22 0.29 0.62
PaCO2 CG 40.5 ± 3.8 47.6 ± 5.6 35.2 ± 6.1 38.6 ± 5.9 43.3 ± 5.7
EG 41.2 ± 5.7 42.8 ± 3.7 40.7 ± 5.4 45.6 ± 6.1 45.8 ± 6.3
F 2.25 2.29 1.28 1.07 1.22
P 0.19 0.19 0.65 0.82 0.66
  1. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F PH-value(embolization) = 54.18, F PH-value(time) = 6.71, F PH-value(embolization × time) = 95.24, and F PaCO2 (time) = 32.45
  2. CG Control group, EG Embolization group