Skip to main content

Table 3 Blood gas analysis comparison between the two groups

From: Effects of internal iliac artery embolization on systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs with simulated-pelvic-fracture combined with massive bleeding

Index

Group

Pre-modeling

Post-modeling

0 h

2 h

4 h

8 h

pH value

CG

7.34 ± 0.04

7.29 ± 0.06

7.27 ± 0.03

7.22 ± 0.04

7.16 ± 0.03

EG

7.32 ± 0.03

7.33 ± 0.05

7.27 ± 0.04

7.25 ± 0.04

7.22 ± 0.03

F

1.78

1.44

1.78

1.11

8.58

P

0.25

0.41

0.25

0.79

0.0067

PaO2

CG

120.4 ± 5.7

112.4 ± 6.9

100.5 ± 5.4

108.5 ± 6.1

111.3 ± 7.1

EG

121.6 ± 6.1

114.6 ± 7.2

105.2 ± 7.7

111.5 ± 4.7

109.3 ± 6.4

F

1.15

1.09

2.03

1.68

1.23

P

0.78

0.82

0.22

0.29

0.62

PaCO2

CG

40.5 ± 3.8

47.6 ± 5.6

35.2 ± 6.1

38.6 ± 5.9

43.3 ± 5.7

EG

41.2 ± 5.7

42.8 ± 3.7

40.7 ± 5.4

45.6 ± 6.1

45.8 ± 6.3

F

2.25

2.29

1.28

1.07

1.22

P

0.19

0.19

0.65

0.82

0.66

  1. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F PH-value(embolization) = 54.18, F PH-value(time) = 6.71, F PH-value(embolization × time) = 95.24, and F PaCO2 (time) = 32.45
  2. CG Control group, EG Embolization group