Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons of vital signs between the two groups

From: Effects of internal iliac artery embolization on systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs with simulated-pelvic-fracture combined with massive bleeding

Group MAP (mmHg) HR (t/min) RR (t/min)
CG Pre-modeling 145.2 ± 11.2 190.5 ± 9.7 16.7 ± 3.5
0 h post-modeling 139.5 ± 9.6 210.9 ± 11.4 35.5 ± 5.4
2 h post-modeling 110.4 ± 8.5 229.7 ± 10.5 38.5 ± 3.6
4 h post-modeling 97.2 ± 7.5 230.2 ± 9.7 39.2 ± 2.8
8 h post-modeling 85.2 ± 10.3 260.5 ± 11.5 42.6 ± 7.3
EG Pre-modeling 139.6 ± 16.1 201.1 ± 10.2 17.9 ± 2.9
0 h post-modeling 142.7 ± 8.5 217.8 ± 11.2 38.2 ± 9.4
2 h post-modeling 117.2 ± 9.6 210.5 ± 7.9 27.5 ± 5.5
4 h post-modeling 115.6 ± 5.3* 195.8 ± 5.8* 29.3 ± 9.6*
8 h post-modeling 102.8 ± 5.8* 200.6 ± 11.3* 25.5 ± 6.9*
  1. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD
  2. CG Control group, EG Embolization group, MAP Mean arterial pressure, HR Heart rate, RR Respiratory rate
  3. * P < 0.05 compared with CG group at the same time point; P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F MAP (embolization) =12.61 and F RR (embolization × time) =20.52