Effects of internal iliac artery embolization on systemic inflammatory response syndrome in dogs with simulated-pelvic-fracture combined with massive bleeding

Table 1 Comparisons of vital signs between the two groups

Group		MAP (mmHg)	HR (t/min)	RR (t/min)
CG	Pre-modeling	145.2 ± 11.2	190.5 ± 9.7	16.7 ± 3.5
	0 h post-modeling	139.5 ± 9.6	210.9 ± 11.4	35.5 ± 5.4
	2 h post-modeling	110.4 ± 8.5	229.7 ± 10.5	38.5 ± 3.6
	4 h post-modeling	97.2 ± 7.5	230.2 ± 9.7	39.2 ± 2.8
	8 h post-modeling	85.2 ± 10.3	260.5 ± 11.5	42.6 ± 7.3
EG	Pre-modeling	139.6 ± 16.1	201.1 ± 10.2	17.9 ± 2.9
	0 h post-modeling	142.7 ± 8.5	217.8 ± 11.2	38.2 ± 9.4
	2 h post-modeling	117.2 ± 9.6	210.5 ± 7.9	27.5 ± 5.5
	4 h post-modeling	115.6 ± 5.3^*	195.8 ± 5.8^*	29.3 ± 9.6^*
	8 h post-modeling	102.8 ± 5.8^*	200.6 ± 11.3^*	25.5 ± 6.9^*

The data are expressed as the mean ± SD
CG Control group, EG Embolization group, MAP Mean arterial pressure, HR Heart rate, RR Respiratory rate
^* P < 0.05 compared with CG group at the same time point; P < 0.05 results of repeated measures data of ANOVA are F _MAP (embolization) =12.61 and F _RR (embolization × time) =20.52

ISSN: 2054-9369